MR

Monthly Review
Subscribe to
MONTHLY
REVIEW
!

MONTHLY
REVIEW
ONLINE
ARCHIVE

for Subscribers

Buy directly
from the

MR STORE
and support
MONTHLY
REVIEW
!

Donate to MR! $

Follow mrzine_notes on Twitter

RSS

Subscribe to MRZine

MRZINE
ARCHIVE


SEARCH

SUBMISSIONS

CONTACT
06.03.13 About MR



Monthly Review Press

Understanding the Venezuelan Revolution
UNDERSTAND-
ING THE VENEZUELAN REVOLUTION: Hugo Chavez Talks to Marta Harnecker by Hugo Chavez and Marta Harnecker


Bush versus Chávez
BUSH VERSUS CHÁVEZ: Washington's War on Venezuela
by Eva Golinger


Open Veins of Latin America
OPEN VEINS OF LATIN AMERICA:
Five Centuries of the Pillage of a Continent
by Eduardo Galeano


Revolutionary Doctors
REVOLUTION-
ARY DOCTORS: How Venezuela and Cuba Are Changing the World's Conception of Health Care by Steve Brouwer


The Contradictions of 'Real Socialism': The Conductor and the Conducted
THE CONTRADIC-
TIONS OF "REAL SOCIALISM": The Conductor and the Conducted by Michael A. Lebowitz



"Por Ahora": A Few Words for Hugo Chávez
by Chris Gilbert

Caracas, March 6, 2013

Hugo Chávez, who died yesterday afternoon, was something of an Emersonian hero.  "Speak your latent conviction," said the sage of Concord, "and it shall be the universal sense."

Chávez said things that other people thought, or at least recognized that they thought after he said them.

One could say that he expanded the notion of the political.  He sang and recited poems during his innumerable hours of television . . . he talked incessantly.

This bothered the shit out of some people.  Including me (I have to admit) some of the time.  But a lot of the time I liked it.


Most people won't remember well the details of the moment in which Chávez implied that George W. Bush was the devil.  The truth is it wasn't planned at all.

I believe the "mot juste" simply occurred to Chávez there in UN in 2006.  Who smelled more of sulfur than Bush?  The words traveled around the globe.

These days, for a variety of reasons -- even theoretical reasons -- it is widely understood that political discourse has gotten pretty useless, pretty separated from people's real needs.

In Argentina people said in 2001: "¡Que se vayan todos!"  In Spain everyone understands politics to be the equivalent of corruption.  Let's not even speak of the U.S.  (Does anyone even remember "Change" or "Yes We Can"?).

Chávez had his own solution to this problem.  Surely it was problematic, excessively personalist.

On the other hand, it did connect with people in a way that went beyond simple reason.  It inspired Venezuelans, Latin Americans, and many others.

To inspire is literally to fill with breath, or life.  Politics has become something too without feeling, without flavor, without life.  It has become an affair conducted by strawmen and strawwomen.

Chávez, whatever one thinks of him, was not a straw man.  He was actually a gentleman in that he was never vulgar (in the real sense of that term), and he never humiliated weak people.  Only the strong.

The earliest video recording of Chávez that I have seen shows a young officer, incredibly gregarious, singing and trying to get people to sing.  It would be a good way to remember him if it were not for his most brilliant political moment: the "por ahora" speech.

This was not planned either: Chávez, after giving himself up in the failed military uprising of 1992, was permitted a couple of minutes on national television.  He basically said that the uprising should cease, that everyone should abandon their arms.

But almost unconsciously, without thinking much about it, really only to be true to himself (his latent conviction) Chávez slipped in the words "por ahora" ("for now").

That was the proverbial spark that set fire to the field.  That fire continues to burn in Latin America and in the world, and will for some time.

It is also true that a few more sparks of its kind are needed.


Chris Gilbert is professor of Political Science at the Universidad Bolivariana de Venezuela.
| Print
MR